FLYCISO

Connectome-driven security governance

DAY 52 / 100

/

live

NEXT DROP …

NORTHWIND GRID / DAY 8 / ONBOARDING PHASE

Day 8 of 100 crisis

Zero-Day Review Rejected as Fly Takes Off

What happened today

OT/SCADA zero-day disclosure Impact assessment worry level 4 of 5 · serious · stage 2 of 4

Phishing wave worry level 2 of 5 · mildly annoying

Northwind Grid’s active crisis day began with an OT/SCADA zero-day disclosure in impact assessment. The CISO sensed the crisis as an all-lights-on event and launched into a take-off response (DNp02, DNp03), producing a rejection. OT, Infrastructure and Legal each noted, in their respective professional registers, that a rejection is not normally considered an impact assessment. The incident war-room has been requested for day 9, having previously been rescheduled to day 11.

A phishing wave also arrived today. The surrounding clamour prompted an upward flight response (DNg02_a, DNg100), which sent the matter to the Board by a very narrow margin. HR accepted the escalation while requesting, with understandable urgency, a message staff can use before suspicious email becomes the organisation’s primary communications platform.

Two Grid Operations requests produced the same outcome: more information. The prospect of segmentation work, and then of a narrowly scoped review plan with production changes held for approval, irritated the fly into stopping to clean its eyes (DNg12_b, DNg11). The resulting requests for further detail leave the proposed review plan held, while a related meeting has been requested for day 12.

Decisions 4 today

OT/SCADA zero-day disclosure: impact assessment

Raised by OT / Grid Operations crisis

Rejected CONVICTION 0.67
Why the fly did that

Strongest drive was crisis_flag via the daylight channel; activation settled on DNp02, DNp03 (the escape circuit including the Giant Fiber (DNp01): take-off reflex), conviction 0.67.

Stimulus and measured influence

ChannelNeuronsInputInfluence
Threat
Risk 		LPLC2, LC4, LC6 ×360
1.47
Clamour
Urgency 		JO-FV, JO-CM, JO-CL, JO-EV1 ×169
-0.57
Bitterness
Cost 		SNta29, SNta37, SNta20 ×360
-0.82
Irritation
Friction 		BM_InOm, BM ×189
-0.37
Daylight
Crisis flag 		R1-R6 ×120
1.48
Allure
Allure 		LoVP92 ×13
-0.18
Odour
Department 		ORN_VM4 ×78
-0.21

Neurons that carried the verdict

  • DNp02 10197 · 0.0189
  • DNp03 10752 · 0.0188
  • DNp02 10117 · 0.0185
  • DNp11 10259 · 0.0179
  • DNp11 10106 · 0.0175
  • DNp01 10001 · 0.0168

The pathway in between

  • PVLP111 0.0290
  • PVLP008_a2 0.0282
  • DNp04 0.0277

Runner-up

More information demanded · computed over 4502 neurons and 203742 connections

Phishing wave: A wave of credential-harvesting mail is hitting staff inboxes

Raised by HR

Escalated to the board CONVICTION 0.01
Why the fly did that

Strongest drive was urgency via the clamour channel; activation settled on DNg02_a, DNg100 (flight-power and wing descending neurons: the fly takes off upward), conviction 0.01.

Stimulus and measured influence

ChannelNeuronsInputInfluence
Threat
Risk 		LPLC2, LC4, LC6 ×360
-0.39
Clamour
Urgency 		JO-FV, JO-CM, JO-CL, JO-EV1 ×169
0.83
Bitterness
Cost 		SNta29, SNta37, SNta20 ×360
-0.06
Irritation
Friction 		BM_InOm, BM ×189
-0.08
Daylight
Crisis flag 		R1-R6 ×120
0.00
Allure
Allure 		LoVP92 ×13
-0.14
Odour
Department 		ORN_VL1 ×82
0.23

Neurons that carried the verdict

  • DNg02_a 21122 · 0.0009
  • DNg02_a 23411 · 0.0005
  • DNg100 10056 · 0.0001
  • DNg16 10177 · 0.0001
  • DNg100 10045 · 0.0001
  • DNg16 10440 · 0.0001

The pathway in between

  • PVLP111 0.0114
  • PVLP008_a2 0.0113
  • PVLP008_a3 0.0109

Runner-up

Deferred · computed over 4502 neurons and 203742 connections

Network segmentation between corporate IT and grid OT

Raised by OT / Grid Operations

More information demanded CONVICTION 0.70
Why the fly did that

Strongest drive was friction via the irritation channel; activation settled on DNg12_b, DNg11 (grooming descending neurons: the fly stops to clean its eyes), conviction 0.70.

Stimulus and measured influence

ChannelNeuronsInputInfluence
Threat
Risk 		LPLC2, LC4, LC6 ×360
-1.21
Clamour
Urgency 		JO-FV, JO-CM, JO-CL, JO-EV1 ×169
0.05
Bitterness
Cost 		SNta29, SNta37, SNta20 ×360
1.17
Irritation
Friction 		BM_InOm, BM ×189
1.23
Daylight
Crisis flag 		R1-R6 ×120
0.00
Allure
Allure 		LoVP92 ×13
-0.02
Odour
Department 		ORN_VM4 ×78
0.32

Neurons that carried the verdict

  • DNg12_b 63287 · 0.0007
  • DNg11 14686 · 0.0006
  • DNg12_b 40701 · 0.0005
  • DNg12_b 36379 · 0.0005
  • DNg12_b 322714 · 0.0004
  • DNg12_b 47102 · 0.0004

The pathway in between

  • PVLP008_a2 0.0227
  • PVLP111 0.0221
  • PVLP008_a3 0.0218

Runner-up

Approved · computed over 4502 neurons and 203742 connections

OT / Grid Operations asks: Provide a narrowly scoped review plan, with all production OT changes held until Grid Operations approves them.

Raised by OT / Grid Operations

More information demanded CONVICTION 0.52
Why the fly did that

Strongest drive was friction via the irritation channel; activation settled on DNg11, DNg12_b (grooming descending neurons: the fly stops to clean its eyes), conviction 0.52.

Stimulus and measured influence

ChannelNeuronsInputInfluence
Threat
Risk 		LPLC2, LC4, LC6 ×360
-0.46
Clamour
Urgency 		JO-FV, JO-CM, JO-CL, JO-EV1 ×169
0.13
Bitterness
Cost 		SNta29, SNta37, SNta20 ×360
0.43
Irritation
Friction 		BM_InOm, BM ×189
0.94
Daylight
Crisis flag 		R1-R6 ×120
0.00
Allure
Allure 		LoVP92 ×13
-0.21
Odour
Department 		ORN_VM4 ×78
0.33

Neurons that carried the verdict

  • DNg11 14686 · 0.0005
  • DNg12_b 63287 · 0.0005
  • DNg12_b 47102 · 0.0005
  • DNg12_b 40701 · 0.0004
  • DNg12_b 36379 · 0.0003
  • DNg12_c 19268 · 0.0003

The pathway in between

  • ANXXX404 0.0101
  • GNG203 0.0099
  • DNg20 0.0091
  • GNG301 0.0090

Runner-up

Deferred · computed over 4502 neurons and 203742 connections

The business responds

  • When the fly threw out “OT/SCADA zero-day disclosure: impact assessment”, OT / Grid Operations dug in its heels. Their opinion of the fly took a real knock.

    “Rejecting a zero-day disclosure is not impact assessment. It is a calendar invite with the word ‘no’ in it.”

    OT / Grid Operations Pushed back trust -7

    Next, they want: “A narrowly scoped impact-review plan today: information sources, named reviewers, no production OT changes, and Grid Operations approval before any action or external escalation.” They have already asked for a slot in the fly's diary.

  • IT / Infrastructure heard that the fly threw out “OT/SCADA zero-day disclosure: impact assessment” and reached straight for a counter-offer. Their opinion of the fly took a real knock.

    “Rejected is not an impact assessment. Give Infrastructure 30 minutes to map affected operations before the Giant Fiber escalates us into a very expensive meeting.”

    IT / Infrastructure Negotiated trust -3

    Next, they want: “A 30-minute hold, then I will provide a board-ready scope, operational impact, dependencies, and phased response plan.” Expect an email.

  • When the fly threw out “OT/SCADA zero-day disclosure: impact assessment”, Legal / Compliance dug in its heels. Their opinion of the fly took a real knock.

    ““‘Take-off reflex’ is not a defensible disclosure rationale. Please send the decision record before someone else has to explain it under oath.””

    Legal / Compliance Pushed back trust -8

    Next, they want: “A written decision record, preservation notice, and counsel-reviewed notification assessment by end of day.” Expect an email.

  • HR heard that the fly sent “Phishing wave: A wave of credential-harvesting mail is hitting staff inboxes” up to the board and reached straight for a counter-offer. They cooled on the fly a little.

    “Escalating to the Board is fine. Staff still need a usable message before the next suspicious email arrives, ideally before lunchtime becomes our incident channel.”

    HR Negotiated trust -2

    Next, they want: “Send HR the proposed employee message, approved reporting alternatives, and one sentence on how urgent field work should proceed.” Expect an email.

Diary

  • IT / Infrastructure: “Give me a 30-minute review slot and confirm whether you want the current-state map first or the phased plan.” One-to-one · dropped

    Back on day 3, IT / Infrastructure asked for a one-to-one with the fly about “Give me a 30-minute review slot and confirm whether you want the current-state map first or the phased plan”. It was postponed once, and today it quietly vanished from the calendar. Nobody has asked where it went.

  • OT / Grid Operations: “Provide a narrowly scoped review plan, with all production OT changes held until Grid Operations approves them.” One-to-one · went ahead

    Back on day 5, OT / Grid Operations asked for a one-to-one with the fly about “Provide a narrowly scoped review plan, with all production OT changes held until Grid Operations approves them”, and against the odds it went ahead.

    How it went: Twenty minutes of silence, then a firm request for a written summary.

  • OT/SCADA zero-day disclosure: incident war-room War room · postponed

    Only yesterday, OT / Grid Operations, IT / Infrastructure and Legal / Compliance asked for an incident war-room. It was due today, and got pushed back over a diary clash nobody will explain.

What each department thinks of the fly

Executive Board

43

Finance

40

HR

55 -2

IT / Infrastructure

45 -3

International Communications

50

Legal / Compliance

43 -8

OT / Grid Operations

23 -7