FLYCISO

Connectome-driven security governance

DAY 6 / 100

/

live

NEXT DROP

NORTHWIND GRID / DAY 3 / ONBOARDING PHASE

Day 3 of 100

Segmentation Review Pauses for Eye Cleaning

What happened today

Calm day nothing went wrong

Northwind Grid’s third day of onboarding was calm, though the proposed divide between corporate IT and grid operations proved irritating enough to produce an immediate demand for more information. Faced with the friction of the question, the fly paused to clean its eyes (DNg11, DNg12_b). This has been recorded as a request for further detail, rather than an opinion on segmentation.

A second Grid Operations proposal, for a tightly limited review that leaves production systems untouched pending approval, received the same ruling. The fly again encountered the matter as a bristling inconvenience and began grooming its eyes (DNg12_b, DNg11). OT has agreed to provide more material, on the reasonable condition that the fly eventually identifies which material it requires.

IT Infrastructure will bring maps, dependencies and outage assumptions. It has also asked, with commendable procedural restraint, that the grooming not continue for the full review meeting.

Decisions 2 today

Network segmentation between corporate IT and grid OT

Raised by OT / Grid Operations

More information demanded CONVICTION 0.66
Why the fly did that

Strongest drive was friction via the irritation channel; activation settled on DNg11, DNg12_b (grooming descending neurons: the fly stops to clean its eyes), conviction 0.66.

Stimulus and measured influence

ChannelNeuronsInputInfluence
Threat
Risk
LPLC2, LC4, LC6 ×360
-1.19
Clamour
Urgency
JO-FV, JO-CM, JO-CL, JO-EV1 ×169
0.12
Bitterness
Cost
SNta29, SNta37, SNta20 ×360
1.15
Irritation
Friction
BM_InOm, BM ×189
1.23
Daylight
Crisis flag
R1-R6 ×120
0.00
Allure
Allure
LoVP92 ×13
-0.06
Odour
Department
ORN_VM4 ×78
0.33

Neurons that carried the verdict

  • DNg11 14686 · 0.0007
  • DNg12_b 63287 · 0.0006
  • DNg12_b 40701 · 0.0005
  • DNg12_b 47102 · 0.0005
  • DNg12_b 36379 · 0.0005
  • DNg12_b 322714 · 0.0004

The pathway in between

  • PVLP008_a2 0.0229
  • PVLP111 0.0225
  • PVLP008_a3 0.0220

Runner-up

Approved · computed over 4502 neurons and 203742 connections

OT / Grid Operations asks: Request a narrowly scoped review plan that keeps all changes off production OT until Grid Operations approves them.

Raised by OT / Grid Operations

More information demanded CONVICTION 0.65
Why the fly did that

Strongest drive was friction via the irritation channel; activation settled on DNg12_b, DNg11 (grooming descending neurons: the fly stops to clean its eyes), conviction 0.65.

Stimulus and measured influence

ChannelNeuronsInputInfluence
Threat
Risk
LPLC2, LC4, LC6 ×360
-0.47
Clamour
Urgency
JO-FV, JO-CM, JO-CL, JO-EV1 ×169
0.08
Bitterness
Cost
SNta29, SNta37, SNta20 ×360
0.45
Irritation
Friction
BM_InOm, BM ×189
0.92
Daylight
Crisis flag
R1-R6 ×120
0.00
Allure
Allure
LoVP92 ×13
-0.11
Odour
Department
ORN_VM4 ×78
0.33

Neurons that carried the verdict

  • DNg12_b 63287 · 0.0005
  • DNg11 14686 · 0.0005
  • DNg12_b 47102 · 0.0005
  • DNg12_b 40701 · 0.0004
  • DNg12_b 36379 · 0.0003
  • DNg12_c 19268 · 0.0003

The pathway in between

  • ANXXX404 0.0105
  • GNG203 0.0102
  • DNg20 0.0097
  • GNG301 0.0097

Runner-up

Escalated to the board · computed over 4502 neurons and 203742 connections

The business responds

  • When the fly wanted more information on “Network segmentation between corporate IT and grid OT”, OT / Grid Operations agreed in principle, then started haggling over every detail. They warmed to the fly, very slightly.

    “Fine. We can provide more information, provided the fly specifies what it needs and keeps every proposed change off production OT pending Grid Operations approval.”

    OT / Grid Operations Negotiated trust +1

    Next, they want: “Request a narrowly scoped information list and review plan, with Grid Operations approving any replacement access process before board escalation.” They have already asked for a slot in the fly's diary.

  • When the fly wanted more information on “Network segmentation between corporate IT and grid OT”, IT / Infrastructure agreed in principle, then started haggling over every detail. They warmed to the fly, very slightly.

    “Fine, we will bring you the segmentation map, dependencies, and outage assumptions. Please do not groom through the entire review meeting.”

    IT / Infrastructure Negotiated trust +2

    Next, they want: “Give me a 30-minute review slot and confirm whether you want the current-state map first or the phased plan.” They have already asked for a slot in the fly's diary.

Diary

  • OT / Grid Operations: “Request a narrowly scoped review plan that keeps all changes off production OT until Grid Operations approves them.” One-to-one · postponed

    Back on day 1, OT / Grid Operations asked for a one-to-one with the fly about “Request a narrowly scoped review plan that keeps all changes off production OT until Grid Operations approves them”. It was due today, and got pushed back over a diary clash nobody will explain.

  • IT / Infrastructure: “Give me 30 minutes to confirm scope and affected systems, then I will provide a board-ready summary.” Meeting · went ahead

    Back on day 1, IT / Infrastructure booked a meeting with the fly about “Give me 30 minutes to confirm scope and affected systems, then I will provide a board-ready summary”, and it survived the calendar.

    How it went: Held. Two people attended and one of them was the fly.

What each department thinks of the fly

Executive Board

45

Finance

41

HR

59

IT / Infrastructure

48 +2

International Communications

50

Legal / Compliance

55

OT / Grid Operations

36 +1