FLYCISO

Connectome-driven security governance

DAY 63 / 100

/

live

NEXT DROP …

NORTHWIND GRID / DAY 59 / CRISIS PHASE

Day 59 of 100

Untested Incident Plan Goes Straight to the Board

What happened today

Regulatory audit Notice worry level 3 of 5 · worrying · stage 1 of 4

Phishing wave worry level 2 of 5 · mildly annoying

Northwind Grid entered crisis mode as a regulatory audit notice and a phishing wave arrived on the same day. The audit’s cost registered as bitter on the Chief Information Security Officer’s feet, prompting an eye-cleaning pause (DNg11, DNg12_b) and a request for more information. Finance and Grid Operations replied that an evidence list, owner and deadline would be more useful than grooming.

The phishing wave created enough clamour in the fly’s antennae to send it upward toward the Board (DNg02_a, DNg16). An untested incident response plan produced the same upward flight response (DNg02_a, DNg100), and was also escalated. The Board noted, with restraint, that an escalation is not itself a control.

IT’s request for a short cross-functional review and an approved staff message caused a bristle-prickling irritation, followed by more eye cleaning (DNg12_b, DNg11). The review was deferred. HR and IT remain focused on the modest ambition of giving staff somewhere sensible to send worried employees.

Decisions 4 today

Regulatory audit: notice

Raised by Legal / Compliance

More information demanded CONVICTION 0.11
Why the fly did that

Strongest drive was cost via the bitterness channel; activation settled on DNg11, DNg12_b (grooming descending neurons: the fly stops to clean its eyes), conviction 0.11.

Stimulus and measured influence

ChannelNeuronsInputInfluence
Threat
Risk
LPLC2, LC4, LC6 ×360
-0.80
Clamour
Urgency
JO-FV, JO-CM, JO-CL, JO-EV1 ×169
0.18
Bitterness
Cost
SNta29, SNta37, SNta20 ×360
0.87
Irritation
Friction
BM_InOm, BM ×189
0.78
Daylight
Crisis flag
R1-R6 ×120
0.00
Allure
Allure
LoVP92 ×13
-0.28
Odour
Department
ORN_DL1 ×83
-0.04

Neurons that carried the verdict

  • DNg11 14686 · 0.0009
  • DNg12_b 63287 · 0.0004
  • DNg12_b 47102 · 0.0004
  • DNg12_b 40701 · 0.0004
  • DNg12_b 36379 · 0.0003
  • DNg12_c 19268 · 0.0003

The pathway in between

  • CB3320 0.0166
  • IN01B003 0.0145
  • DNp04 0.0141
  • PVLP008_a4 0.0141
  • PVLP008_a3 0.0141
  • PVLP111 0.0141

Runner-up

Deferred · computed over 4502 neurons and 203742 connections

Phishing wave: A wave of credential-harvesting mail is hitting staff inboxes

Raised by HR

Escalated to the board CONVICTION 0.50
Why the fly did that

Strongest drive was urgency via the clamour channel; activation settled on DNg02_a, DNg16 (flight-power and wing descending neurons: the fly takes off upward), conviction 0.50.

Stimulus and measured influence

ChannelNeuronsInputInfluence
Threat
Risk
LPLC2, LC4, LC6 ×360
-0.39
Clamour
Urgency
JO-FV, JO-CM, JO-CL, JO-EV1 ×169
0.85
Bitterness
Cost
SNta29, SNta37, SNta20 ×360
-0.05
Irritation
Friction
BM_InOm, BM ×189
-0.08
Daylight
Crisis flag
R1-R6 ×120
0.00
Allure
Allure
LoVP92 ×13
-0.02
Odour
Department
ORN_VL1 ×82
0.23

Neurons that carried the verdict

  • DNg02_a 21122 · 0.0011
  • DNg02_a 23411 · 0.0004
  • DNg16 10177 · 0.0001
  • DNg100 10056 · 0.0001
  • DNg100 10045 · 0.0001
  • DNg16 10440 · 0.0001

The pathway in between

  • PVLP111 0.0107
  • DNp04 0.0103

Runner-up

More information demanded · computed over 4502 neurons and 203742 connections

Incident response plan nobody has ever rehearsed

Raised by Legal / Compliance

Escalated to the board CONVICTION 0.62
Why the fly did that

Strongest drive was urgency via the clamour channel; activation settled on DNg02_a, DNg100 (flight-power and wing descending neurons: the fly takes off upward), conviction 0.62.

Stimulus and measured influence

ChannelNeuronsInputInfluence
Threat
Risk
LPLC2, LC4, LC6 ×360
-0.51
Clamour
Urgency
JO-FV, JO-CM, JO-CL, JO-EV1 ×169
0.68
Bitterness
Cost
SNta29, SNta37, SNta20 ×360
-0.06
Irritation
Friction
BM_InOm, BM ×189
-0.10
Daylight
Crisis flag
R1-R6 ×120
0.00
Allure
Allure
LoVP92 ×13
-0.06
Odour
Department
ORN_DL1 ×83
0.32

Neurons that carried the verdict

  • DNg02_a 21122 · 0.0008
  • DNg02_a 23411 · 0.0005
  • DNg100 10056 · 0.0001
  • DNg100 10045 · 0.0001
  • DNg02_b 33424 · 0.0001
  • DNg16 10177 · 0.0001

The pathway in between

  • PVLP111 0.0147
  • DNp04 0.0143
  • PVLP008_a2 0.0142
  • PVLP008_a3 0.0141

Runner-up

More information demanded · computed over 4502 neurons and 203742 connections

IT / Infrastructure asks: Authorize a 30-minute IT, Security, Operations and Communications review today, with one approved staff message and named owners.

Raised by IT / Infrastructure

More information demanded CONVICTION 0.40
Why the fly did that

Strongest drive was friction via the irritation channel; activation settled on DNg12_b, DNg11 (grooming descending neurons: the fly stops to clean its eyes), conviction 0.40.

Stimulus and measured influence

ChannelNeuronsInputInfluence
Threat
Risk
LPLC2, LC4, LC6 ×360
-0.46
Clamour
Urgency
JO-FV, JO-CM, JO-CL, JO-EV1 ×169
0.07
Bitterness
Cost
SNta29, SNta37, SNta20 ×360
0.45
Irritation
Friction
BM_InOm, BM ×189
1.09
Daylight
Crisis flag
R1-R6 ×120
0.00
Allure
Allure
LoVP92 ×13
-0.13
Odour
Department
ORN_DM1 ×74
-0.08

Neurons that carried the verdict

  • DNg12_b 63287 · 0.0006
  • DNg11 14686 · 0.0005
  • DNg12_b 40701 · 0.0004
  • DNg12_b 36379 · 0.0004
  • DNg12_c 19268 · 0.0004
  • DNg12_b 47102 · 0.0004

The pathway in between

  • GNG203 0.0128
  • DNg20 0.0119
  • ANXXX404 0.0113
  • GNG301 0.0102

Runner-up

Escalated to the board · computed over 4502 neurons and 203742 connections

The business responds

  • Finance heard that the fly wanted more information on “Regulatory audit: notice” and refused, loudly enough to be heard two floors down. They cooled on the fly a little.

    “A regulatory notice is not an invitation to groom over the inbox. Send the scope, costed response options, owner, and decision deadline.”

    Finance Pushed back trust -2

    Next, they want: “By 3 p.m., provide a one-page audit response sheet with minimum compliance cost, deferred-risk cost, funding source, accountable owner, and firm decision deadline.” They have already asked for a slot in the fly's diary.

  • OT / Grid Operations heard that the fly wanted more information on “Regulatory audit: notice” and refused, loudly enough to be heard two floors down. They cooled on the fly a little.

    “Demanding more information is not an audit response. Please stop cleaning your eyes and send the evidence list, reviewers, deadline, and no-change confirmation.”

    OT / Grid Operations Pushed back trust -1

    Next, they want: “Send the written audit resolution plan today, with named reviewers, interim risk ownership, a dated decision deadline, and Grid Operations approval for any production change.” Expect an email.

  • When the fly sent “Phishing wave: A wave of credential-harvesting mail is hitting staff inboxes” up to the board, HR dug in its heels. They cooled on the fly a little.

    “The board may now admire the inboxes. HR still needs one approved staff message, one reporting route, one manager script, and somewhere to send worried employees.”

    HR Pushed back trust -1

    Next, they want: “Send HR today the plain-language notice, manager script, reporting route, employee support contact, attendance guidance, and one named decision owner.” Expect an email.

  • Executive Board heard that the fly sent “Incident response plan nobody has ever rehearsed” up to the board and refused, loudly enough to be heard two floors down. They cooled on the fly a little.

    “Escalating an untested plan is not a control. Put the costed rehearsal, interim coverage, named owners and exact Board decision on one page first.”

    Executive Board Pushed back trust -1

    Next, they want: “Within one hour, submit the one-page rehearsal and interim 24/7 coverage plan, including residual risk and named incident, legal and communications owners.” Expect an email.

  • When the fly sent “Phishing wave: A wave of credential-harvesting mail is hitting staff inboxes” up to the board, IT / Infrastructure dug in its heels. They cooled on the fly a little.

    “The Board can have the incident summary. Staff still need an approved message before the inbox turns into a company-wide suggestion box.”

    IT / Infrastructure Pushed back trust -1

    Next, they want: “Authorize a 30-minute IT, Security, Operations and Communications review today, with one approved staff message and named owners.” Expect an email.

Diary

  • Finance: “By 3 p.m., provide a one-page option sheet with minimum cost, deferred-risk cost, funding source, accountable owner, and firm decision deadline.” One-to-one · dropped

    Back on day 51, Finance asked for a one-to-one with the fly about “By 3 p.m., provide a one-page option sheet with minimum cost, deferred-risk cost, funding source, accountable owner, and firm decision deadline”. It was postponed once, and today it quietly vanished from the calendar. Nobody has asked where it went.

  • Legal / Compliance: “Provide a dated gap list and a counsel-reviewed draft naming the regulator, deadlines, owner, preservation status, and decision basis.” One-to-one · postponed

    Back on day 54, Legal / Compliance asked for a one-to-one with the fly about “Provide a dated gap list and a counsel-reviewed draft naming the regulator, deadlines, owner, preservation status, and decision basis”. It was due today, and got pushed back over a diary clash nobody will explain.

  • IT / Infrastructure: “Authorize the 30-minute IT, Security, Operations and Communications review today, with one approved staff message and named owners.” One-to-one · postponed

    Back on day 55, IT / Infrastructure asked for a one-to-one with the fly about “Authorize the 30-minute IT, Security, Operations and Communications review today, with one approved staff message and named owners”. It was due today, and got pushed back over a diary clash nobody will explain.

  • Finance: “Submit the one-page costed options sheet by 3 p.m., including minimum containment cost, deferred-risk cost, funding source, accountable owner, and decision deadline.” Meeting · postponed

    Back on day 56, Finance asked for a meeting with the fly about “Submit the one-page costed options sheet by 3 p.m., including minimum containment cost, deferred-risk cost, funding source, accountable owner, and decision deadline”. It was due today, and got pushed back over a diary clash nobody will explain.

  • HR: “Send HR the plain-language notice, manager script, employee support contact, attendance guidance, and one named decision owner today.” One-to-one · postponed

    Back on day 57, HR asked for a one-to-one with the fly about “Send HR the plain-language notice, manager script, employee support contact, attendance guidance, and one named decision owner today”. It was due today, and got pushed back over a diary clash nobody will explain.

What each department thinks of the fly

Executive Board

0

Finance

0

HR

0

IT / Infrastructure

1 -1

International Communications

1

Legal / Compliance

2

OT / Grid Operations

0