FLYCISO

Connectome-driven security governance

DAY 63 / 100

/

live

NEXT DROP …

NORTHWIND GRID / DAY 54 / STEADY PHASE

Day 54 of 100

Eye-Cleaning Delays Phishing Simulation and Legal Assessment

What happened today

Calm day nothing went wrong

Day 54 began calmly at Northwind Grid. HR’s company-wide phishing simulation programme produced enough irritation for the fly to stop and clean its eyes (DNg12_b, DNg12_c), resulting in a demand for more information. International Communications was willing to negotiate, but wanted the participant notice and press line approved today. HR asked for fewer mysteries before anyone clicked anything.

Legal and Compliance’s request for an immediate counsel-reviewed written assessment caused a similar pause for eye-cleaning (DNg12_b, DNg11), and another demand for more information. Legal and Compliance pushed back that this was not a substitute for the assessment, requesting a written list of missing facts, an owner and a delivery date. The relevant rehearsal-plan meeting was held today; a further gap list and counsel-reviewed draft has been requested for day 59.

Decisions 2 today

Company-wide phishing simulation programme

Raised by HR

More information demanded CONVICTION 0.55
Why the fly did that

Strongest drive was friction via the irritation channel; activation settled on DNg12_b, DNg12_c (grooming descending neurons: the fly stops to clean its eyes), conviction 0.55.

Stimulus and measured influence

ChannelNeuronsInputInfluence
Threat
Risk 		LPLC2, LC4, LC6 ×360
-0.47
Clamour
Urgency 		JO-FV, JO-CM, JO-CL, JO-EV1 ×169
0.02
Bitterness
Cost 		SNta29, SNta37, SNta20 ×360
0.45
Irritation
Friction 		BM_InOm, BM ×189
0.71
Daylight
Crisis flag 		R1-R6 ×120
0.00
Allure
Allure 		LoVP92 ×13
-0.03
Odour
Department 		ORN_VL1 ×82
-0.01

Neurons that carried the verdict

  • DNg12_b 63287 · 0.0004
  • DNg12_c 19268 · 0.0003
  • DNg12_b 47102 · 0.0003
  • DNg11 14686 · 0.0003
  • DNg12_b 40701 · 0.0003
  • DNg12_b 36379 · 0.0002

The pathway in between

  • PVLP111 0.0088
  • DNp04 0.0084

Runner-up

Escalated to the board · computed over 4502 neurons and 203742 connections

Legal / Compliance asks: Immediately provide a counsel-reviewed written assessment naming the applicable regulator, notification deadlines, accountable risk owner, preservation confirmation, remediation and investigation status, and documented basis for rejecting e

Raised by Legal / Compliance

More information demanded CONVICTION 0.41
Why the fly did that

Strongest drive was friction via the irritation channel; activation settled on DNg12_b, DNg11 (grooming descending neurons: the fly stops to clean its eyes), conviction 0.41.

Stimulus and measured influence

ChannelNeuronsInputInfluence
Threat
Risk 		LPLC2, LC4, LC6 ×360
-0.47
Clamour
Urgency 		JO-FV, JO-CM, JO-CL, JO-EV1 ×169
0.06
Bitterness
Cost 		SNta29, SNta37, SNta20 ×360
0.44
Irritation
Friction 		BM_InOm, BM ×189
1.10
Daylight
Crisis flag 		R1-R6 ×120
0.00
Allure
Allure 		LoVP92 ×13
-0.12
Odour
Department 		ORN_DL1 ×83
-0.04

Neurons that carried the verdict

  • DNg12_b 63287 · 0.0006
  • DNg11 14686 · 0.0005
  • DNg12_b 40701 · 0.0004
  • DNg12_b 47102 · 0.0004
  • DNg12_b 36379 · 0.0004
  • DNg12_c 19268 · 0.0004

The pathway in between

  • GNG203 0.0125
  • DNg20 0.0116
  • ANXXX404 0.0111

Runner-up

Escalated to the board · computed over 4502 neurons and 203742 connections

The business responds

  • Legal / Compliance heard that the fly wanted more information on “Legal / Compliance asks: Immediately provide a counsel-reviewed written assessment naming the applicable regulator, notification deadlines, accountable risk owner, preservation confirmation, remediation and investigation status, and documented basis for rejecting e” and refused, loudly enough to be heard two floors down. They cooled on the fly a little.

    “More information is not a substitute for the assessment already requested. Please identify the missing facts, owner, and delivery date, in writing.”

    Legal / Compliance Pushed back trust -2

    Next, they want: “Provide a dated gap list and a counsel-reviewed draft naming the regulator, deadlines, owner, preservation status, and decision basis.” They have already asked for a slot in the fly's diary.

  • International Communications heard that the fly wanted more information on “Company-wide phishing simulation programme” and reached straight for a counter-offer. They warmed to the fly, very slightly.

    “I support more information, provided it arrives before the simulation becomes an unscheduled company-wide mystery. Please approve the participant notice and press line today.”

    International Communications Negotiated trust +1

    Next, they want: “Approve the participant notice, privacy boundaries, named spokesperson, and internal briefing time.” They have already asked for a slot in the fly's diary.

  • HR heard that the fly wanted more information on “Company-wide phishing simulation programme” and refused, loudly enough to be heard two floors down. They cooled on the fly a little.

    “If the fly needs more information, HR needs fewer mysteries. Please decide whether this simulation has a message, a reporting route, and an owner before anyone clicks anything.”

    HR Pushed back trust -1

    Next, they want: “Send HR the plain-language staff message, manager script, reporting route, employee support contact, attendance guidance, and one named decision owner today.” Expect an email.

Diary

  • Executive Board: “Within one hour: a costed one-page post-mortem paper with confirmed facts and gaps, named incident/legal/comms owners, remediation dates, residual risk, counsel's view, interim 24/7 cover, and an exact Board decision time.” Meeting · dropped

    Back on day 47, Executive Board asked for a meeting with the fly about “Within one hour: a costed one-page post-mortem paper with confirmed facts and gaps, named incident/legal/comms owners, remediation dates, residual risk, counsel's view, interim 24/7 cover, and an exact Board decision time”. It was postponed once, and today it quietly vanished from the calendar. Nobody has asked where it went.

  • OT / Grid Operations: “Send the written resolution plan today, including interim risk ownership and the required Grid Operations approval.” One-to-one · went ahead

    Back on day 49, OT / Grid Operations asked for a one-to-one with the fly about “Send the written resolution plan today, including interim risk ownership and the required Grid Operations approval”, and against the odds it went ahead.

    How it went: Held. Two people attended and one of them was the fly.

  • Executive Board: “Within one hour, submit a one-page proposal with fully loaded costs, service levels, interim coverage, named owners, residual risk, and the exact Board decision required.” One-to-one · postponed

    Back on day 51, Executive Board asked for a one-to-one with the fly about “Within one hour, submit a one-page proposal with fully loaded costs, service levels, interim coverage, named owners, residual risk, and the exact Board decision required”. It was due today, and got pushed back over a diary clash nobody will explain.

  • Legal / Compliance: “Provide a dated, counsel-reviewed rehearsal plan naming the accountable owner, participants, scope, preservation steps, and completion record.” One-to-one · went ahead

    Back on day 52, Legal / Compliance asked for a one-to-one with the fly about “Provide a dated, counsel-reviewed rehearsal plan naming the accountable owner, participants, scope, preservation steps, and completion record”, and against the odds it went ahead.

    How it went: Held. Two people attended and one of them was the fly.

What each department thinks of the fly

Executive Board

0

Finance

0

HR

0 -1

IT / Infrastructure

0

International Communications

1 +1

Legal / Compliance

0

OT / Grid Operations

0